HomeCity GovernmentCity BusinessResidentse-Government - Forms OnlineCalendar of EventsFrequently Asked QuestionsContact Us

spacer
spacer
spacerHome > Government > Boards and Commissions > Historic District Commission > 2000 > Minutes > September 19

 Boards and Commissions

City of Rockville Historic District Commission
Submitted: October 17, 2000  
Approved: ___________  
CITY OF ROCKVILLE
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION  

Tuesday, September 19, 2000

Meeting No. 8-2000

The City of Rockville Historic District Commission convened in regular session

in the Mayor and Council Chambers, Rockville City Hall, at 7:20 PM  
Internet information: www.ci.rockville.md.us/GetInvolved/HDC

 

PRESENT

Andrea Hartranft, Chair
Craig Moloney Anita Neal-Powell  
Absent:Commissioner Elizabeth Rodgers  
Staff: Judy Christensen, Preservation Planner;
Cynthia Kebba, Planner II  

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

·        July 18, 2000 (Meeting No. 7-2000)

MOTION:

Commissioner Moloney moved, seconded by Commissioner Neal-Powell, to approve the minutes of the Historic District Commission meeting of July 18, 2000 as submitted.

VOTE: 3-0

II. APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

1. HDC00-0170 -Applicant: William Jacob

For property at 112 Forest Avenue
Request: Replace roof on main house and rear addition, repair & replace portions of porch, replace storm windows, replace some siding and trim boards
Action: Approve or deny


Planner Kebba identified the site and affected areas of the structure with photographs and maps. She noted that Applicant requested removal of the existing patterned tin shingles on the main house and replacement with a metal roofing material. Two of the proposed materials are a patterned shingle similar to the original and would fall under ordinary maintenance.  Galvanized metal shingles would be closest to the existing roof; coated copper shingles could have a similar pattern. The third choice is standing seam copper roofing, which is not identical in design to the existing roof material and would need HDC approval.  The porch and siding renovations are all ordinary maintenance and do not require HDC approval.

Applicant William Jacobs stated that he consulted three local roofing companies and all said the present 100 year-old plus roof had reached the end of its serviceable and repairable life.  He has not decided which material to use and requested advice from the Commission.  He stated that the galvanized steel shingles are available from the manufacturer with a colored coating.  The copper can be ordered with a factory applied patina color or in raw copper that will change color with age.  The Applicant stated that he preferred the raw color. The copper roof material has less maintenance, although it is higher in initial cost.   

The Applicant stated that the front porch roof was replaced several years ago and that this roof is sound despite some water damage that is evident on the porch ceiling. The roof on the modern rear addition presently has asphalt roofing. He said that the pitch of the roof on the rear addition is at the lowest threshold for using asphalt shingles and he would like to replace it with a standing seam metal roof such as exists on the front porch.

The Applicant stated that the existing aluminum storm windows were deteriorating and no longer functional.  The tracks were improperly installed without weep holes and were collecting rain, which rotted the sills.  He asked to remove the present storm windows and install others which function better. He proposed external “invisible” storm windows from Allied Window, Inc.

No citizens spoke in favor of or in opposition to this application.

In discussion, the HDC thanked Mr. Jacobs for his selection of materials that meet the adopted guidelines and for his efforts to preserve the integrity of the house.  Commissioner Moloney said the patterned shingles would be the best choice for the main roof as it is closest in design to the original.  As replacement with fishscale patterned metal shingles constitutes ordinary maintenance, Mr. Jacobs and the HDC agreed that Mr. Jacobs would inform staff of his final choice and request a staff approval. 

Regarding the storm windows, Commissioner Moloney said some styles of storm windows hide the window details.  He also inquired about egress requirements if the windows are not operable.  He asked that the storm window choice also be submitted to staff for approval.  Mr. Jacobs indicated that he would do so.

MOTION:            

Commissioner Moloney moved, seconded by Commissioner Neal-Powell, to approve HDC00-170, finding the applicant’s choices for replacement roofing and storm windows at 112 Forest Avenue are in compliance with the approved guidelines.  The following condition applies:

1.  The applicant’s final product choices are subject to approval by staff.

VOTE:  3-0

2. HDC00-0171 - Applicant: Rockville United Methodist Church/New Day Preschool
For property leased at 107 West Jefferson Street
Request: Replace fence enclosing playground at rear of property and enlarge enclosed area
Action: Approve or deny

Planner Kebba stated that this application requested installation of either a dark vinyl-coated chain link fence or white vinyl picket fence around the pre-school playground which is located in the rear yard of 107 West Jefferson Street, adjacent to the Rockville United Methodist Church.  The church has amended the application to expand the playground area 17 feet towards Jefferson Street. Ms. Kebba identified the site and area affected with photographs and maps, and noted that the site is not easily visible from any public ways. The present fence is primarily wood picket but also is composed of steel post and chain link fencing.

The preschool selected two materials that would protect the children from alley and parking lot traffic, splinters, and sharp edges.  The applicant’s first choice is coated chain link and second choice is a vinyl picket fence, both of which would be 48 inches high or approximately the same height as the current fence.  Other fences in this block of the historic district are wrought iron, wood picket, and steel post/chain link fence installed before district designation.  Ms. Kebba stated that staff must evaluate each application on a case by case basis given the location, according to the guidelines.  She cited an excerpt from the Architectural Guidelines that states that chain link fences, when visible from public spaces, are generally inappropriate to the character of the Rockville districts.  The child safety and visibility circumstances of this application led to staff’s recommendation of the white vinyl picket fence as the most compatible with the district.

Preschool representative Joyce Elliot stated that the school would prefer the chain link option as being less obtrusive and $3,000 to $4,000 less expensive.  She noted that other chain link fences exist in the neighborhood and at the Presbyterian Church on West Montgomery Avenue. Using photographs, she clarified the location of the expanded playground area, the fencing to remain, and the landscaping in the area.

Charles Karochis, owner of the property at 107 West Jefferson, said the enlarged playground will project further into his rear yard but will remain about 30 feet from the rear of the structure. One stand of trees currently outside the fence perimeter will be enclosed by the new fence, but several trees and shrubs will still be outside the fence to partially block its view.  Mr. Karochis also recommended the chain link fence as less obtrusive.

Maggie Osgood, a member of Rockville United Methodist Church facilities committee, concurred that the white vinyl picket fence would be far more obtrusive than the dark coated chain link fence.  She noted that the playground and natural wood fence are difficult to see in the exhibit photographs and the white vinyl will draw attention to the area and alter the view of the property.

In discussion, the HDC expressed concern about the precedent of installation of either chain link fence or vinyl picket fence, neither of which had been previously approved in historic districts. Chain link fencing is not permitted under the adopted guidelines, as it was not in use in the Victorian era that defines the district character. The vinyl picket fence resembles an approved type of fence but the material is not traditional. The HDC concurred with the applicant that the white color would draw attention to the playground area. The applicant’s product information mentioned other colors for some fence styles but apparently only white is available for the “Contemporary” picket fence style proposed.  Commissioner Moloney cautioned that dark colored vinyl could fade. The HDC found that the traditional picket style fence was preferable to chain link.  Although vinyl has not been previously approved, the intended use as a preschool playground enclosure creates a unique situation where the safety of small children is an issue. Therefore, this non-conforming material was approved for this use and this location alone and will not be applicable to other locations in the historic districts. Commissioner Neal-Powell stated that she was not in favor of either option and other materials could have been proposed as well.   

MOTION: 

Commissioner Moloney moved, seconded by Commissioner Neal-Powell, to approve the installation of a 48-inch high white vinyl picket fence with two gates around the expanded playground area at the rear of 107 West Jefferson Street as presented, with the existing steel set in concrete fencing at the west side next to the church parking lot to remain.

            VOTE: 3-0-1 (Abstained: Neal-Powell)

III. COMMITTEE/ORGANIZATION REPORTS    

A. Lincoln Park Historical Society

Anita Neal-Powell reported that she attended Governor Glendening’s Task Force on Monday, September 18.  The Lincoln Park Historical Society (LPHS) plans another tour of 12 former African-American heritage sites in November.  Ms. Neal-Powell proposed a partnership between The LPHS and the HDC to promote the LPHS.  She suggested that the HDC could assist in many ways including utilizing the HDC web site, doing research, and obtaining maps and aerials.

B. Peerless Rockville Historic Preservation

Mazie Cummings, Curator of the Peerless Rockville Collection, represented Peerless Rockville. She stated that the Peerless Rockville Collection has more than 3,500 historic photographs, objects and research materials used for interpretation and Peerless Rockville’s many programs and tours.  She said that Peerless is delighted with the publication of the Lost Rockville brochure and happy that its research facilities were useful in its preparation.

Peerless is co-sponsoring the F. Scott Fitzgerald Literary conference this weekend.  It is also participating with the Lincoln Park Historical Society, the Montgomery County Historic Society, the Rockville Regional Library, the Montgomery County Archives and the United Black Cultural Center on the Lincoln Park Partners Project.  The goal of the project is to identify historical resources important to the Lincoln Park community, to prepare a guide and to host a web page.  The Lincoln Park Partners Project web site is hosted by the Rockville Regional Library and Peerless will be linked to it.  In addition, the Lincoln Park Partners Project has begun a series of three workshops on capturing family and neighborhood history, preserving heirlooms, and doing oral histories.  A two-part oral history program sponsored by the City of Rockville Parks and Recreation Department in October will follow the workshops.  Sima Osdoby and Pat Andersen will be presenting the workshop. 

On July 27, 2000, Peerless co-hosted the 15th Anniversary of the Montgomery County Archives.  Presentations recognizing the contributions of the Archives were given by Montgomery County Council Member Blair Ewing, and by State Senator Jennie Forehand. Senator Forehand discussed her leadership role in the Saving Our Stories Program, a national effort to gather the stories of important early women legislators.  Highlighting the program was the signing of a Deed of Gift to the Archives by Mary Werner Rose, daughter and presenter of the personal papers of Stella B. Werner.  The Montgomery County Office Building is named in Mrs. Werner’s honor.

Peerless is in the process of repairing the fence at the Old Baptist Cemetery and is exploring an appropriate response in what its role might be with regard to the Rockville Cemetery in its role as a protector and monitor of Rockville's historic fabric.  

IV. DISCUSSION/ UPDATES:

A. Demolition of 604 N. Horners Lane, Lincoln Park

Planner Kebba stated that minutes of the Development Review Committee recorded that Mount Calvary Baptist Church had been advised that HDC staff should do a preliminary review of the historic and cultural significance of the structure and forward it to the HDC if it met the criteria for historic designation.  She spoke to church representatives and project team members regarding this review at that time.  She stated that she called again before the agenda deadline for the September HDC meeting requesting that the church submit any history and information the church had available for staff and HDC review.  The call was not returned.  It was later learned that the church applied for a demolition permit and it was issued by an employee who was not informed of the correct procedures, and the church demolished the building the same day.

Staff liaison Christensen said that Rockville’s Environmental Guidelines require staff or HDC review prior to demolition of any structure 50 years old or older.  However, a written procedure for demolition was not produced as the City had only one or two demolitions per year and was handling them informally between departments.  The staff has since changed, and the new employees were not aware of the informal procedures and requirements.  She said that every demolition application in the future would be routed through the preservation office for approval before a permit is issued.

The members concurred that a letter will be sent to the church from the HDC expressing disappointment that the demolition occurred before an opportunity was made to relocate the building, find an alternate use, or record the history of one of the 14 original structures in Lincoln Park. 

B. Montgomery Cable TV pedestals

Planner Christensen stated that the HDC does regulate placement of utility boxes such as Cable TV boxes in the City right-of-way in historic districts.  Upon investigation, it was found that the boxes were replacing similar boxes previously installed with HDC approval.  In this case, the installation could be considered ordinary maintenance, but the HDC or staff should have had an opportunity to review the proposed boxes before installation to see if mitigation was in order or possible. The new boxes are painted light green and are slightly larger than the previous boxes, about 18 inches high. The cable company left an information package at each location with the boxes offering landscaping around the boxes to property owners who request it. However, a memo from the Department of Public Works was circulated stating that it is illegal to plant or place anything on the City right-of-way without the written approval of the Department of Public Works.  Staff has not received any landscape requests or complaints so far. Three boxes were noted on West Montgomery Avenue. Commissioner Moloney stated that several are placed in the triangle between West Montgomery and West Jefferson and they are more obvious than those in private yards where they blend with background plantings.  Staff will photograph the boxes and send a report to the HDC.

C. Replacement of street lights on W. Jefferson from Great Falls Road to Maryland Avenue Planner Kebba stated that the City was in process of replacing street light poles in downtown Rockville and 30 remain to be replaced on West Jefferson Street, west of Maryland Avenue in the historic district. The City has two approved light poles to choose from and requested a selection from the HDC.  Chairman Hartranft, who is a lighting designer and engineer by profession, stated that both were a common “cobra head” type of light fixture that is reasonably priced, but does not protect from glare and provides little light for pedestrians.   It was noted that City Staff and the HDC are currently revising the Historic Preservation chapter of the City of Rockville Master Plan which at present calls for a redesign of the historic district streetscapes to highlight their age and character.  One element of this is a shorter globe type of streetlight that is now in use in the Courthouse Square Historic District area.  The HDC concurred that replacement of the light poles is premature, as once installed, it would not be practical to remove them for many years.  Therefore, staff was directed to write a memo to the Department of Public Works on behalf of the HDC explaining that the HDC would prefer that the CIP project funds be encumbered until the Master Plan is finalized.

V. ADJOURN

There being no further business to come before the Historic District Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.

Respectfully submitted

Judy Christensen/ Cindy Kebba

HDC Staff Liaisons

home | city government | city business | residents | e-gov | calendar | faq | contact us | privacy | accessibility

Rockville City Government
Rockville City Hall • 111 Maryland Avenue • Rockville, MD 20850
240-314-5000


Please e-mail questions or comments to the Web Administrator.