Boards and Commissions of Rockville, MD
HUMAN
SERVICES ADVISORY COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
March 11, 2003
7:30 9:45 PM
Lincoln Park Community Center
357 Frederick Avenue
| Members
Present: |
Darrell Butler
Bill Goodwin
Deborah Hopson
|
Tom Lawrey
David LHeureux
Ann Reiss
|
Agnes
Saenz
John Sverha
Charlotte Zuckman |
|
Members
Absent:
|
Allison
Bunge |
William
Meeker |
|
|
Staff
Present:
|
Sarah
Gicale |
Mary Lou
Jacobs |
|
| Guests: |
Michael Berman, Chair, City of Rockville Human Rights Commission
|
Re: Presentation on
Activities of Rockville Human Rights Commission
Michael Berman, Chair of
the Rockville Human Rights Commission, explained that the commission he represents
has recently been moved from the City Managers Office to the Department
of Neighborhood and Community Services, which he considers a natural home for
the work that it does. The Human Rights Commissions responsibilities include:
outreach, a Mediation Program, various policy initiatives, and investigation
of charges of discrimination.
Mike defined outreach as basically education. He said that their biggest event
is the Diversity Leadership Workshop, which is scheduled for April 26, 2003.
Twenty students from high schools located in Rockville and twenty students from
Montgomery College attend this daylong event. Designed to increase sensitivity,
typical discussions at the workshop concern ethnicity, race, religion, gender
and sexual orientation. In the last part of the workshop, participants work
on strategies to change societal attitudes. Other forms of outreach include
mock trials, staffing booths at various city events, colloquia and the Martin
Luther King event, which Commission members start planning in August. This year
the event included a documentary on Rockville residents who had lived through
the sixties.
Mike explained that the Mediation Program, which is staffed by members of the
Human Rights Commission as well as trained community members, is intended to
assist Rockville residents who have a dispute in solving their differences.
The program does not assist with family conflicts or with certain kinds of employment
discrimination. Referrals for the program come from the police, from the courts,
and from other community members. Training in mediation techniques is offered
once a year and will be held next in July. The City offers the forty-hour training
for free. Mike invited Human Services Advisory Commission members to attend.
Policy, the third area of responsibility for the Human Rights Commission, Mike
said, is the most difficult. This entails advising the Mayor and Council on
issues as, for example, the Citys affirmative action plan. Another example
is a proclamation urging President Bush to look harder at diplomacy, which the
Commission nine days ago sent to the Mayor and Council for consideration. Finally,
the Human Rights Commission is also responsible for investigating charges of
discrimination within the city. Typically, Mike said, these go to mediation.
Bill Goodwin thanked Mike for his presentation and congratulated the Human Rights
Commission members for their activism.
Re: Approve Minutes
of February 11, 2003 Meeting
The minutes of the February
11, 2003 meeting were approved as written. There was a brief discussion of the
format currently used in the minutes, specifically as to whether comments by
guest speakers should be summarized. There was consensus that the format did
not need to be changed at this time but might be reviewed again in the future.
Re: Disposition of Beginning
to End, A Plan to End Homelessness in Montgomery County
Bill Goodwin asked if members
had any additional thoughts on the content of the plan. Ann Reiss said that
most of it is county and state-based. One issue in the plan, health care, is
an issue for the City as well as the County. Agnes Saenz said that she does
not think the City should be excluded. There are seven homeless shelters in
or just outside the City limits. John said that it would seem important for
the Human Services Advisory Commission to endorse the plan. He said that the
plan goes to the core of what the Commission should be doing. The plan will
not end homelessness but it is necessary to maximize resources for this problem.
Bill then asked how the
Commission should dispose of the issue. He passed around an outline he made
demonstrating the options available to the Commission. One option is for the
Commission to send a letter to the Montgomery County Coalition for the Homeless.
Another is for the Commission to communicate privately with the Mayor and Council.
A third option is to communicate publicly which would increase visibility. If
the public approach were to be used, Bill said there would be an opportunity
for a dialogue.
Agnes said she doesnt
see what the issue is in supporting the plan. The City already supports seven
shelter programs. She doesnt see any risk and doesnt think that
supporting the plan would mean that the City would have to give funds. Tom Lawrey
responded that there is a political issue. If a weakness were found in the plan,
their support could potentially embarrass the Mayor and Council. David LHeureux
agreed saying that the Mayor and Council are sensitive to spending more money.
Bill asked for a straw
vote. The consensus was that the Commission should communicate privately with
the Mayor and Council. After further discussion it was moved and passed unanimously
that a forwarding letter should be drafted to accompany the plan that would
advise the Mayor and Council that they should consider endorsing the plan. Bill
and Agnes agreed to draft the letter. David added that the letter could also
say that the Commission is willing to discuss the plan with the Mayor and Council
at the upcoming worksession if they are so inclined.
Re: Planning for Upcoming
Worksession with Mayor and Council
The working draft, mailed
to Commission members prior to the meeting, was reviewed. Bill said that regarding
the Commissions Annual Report, he would like to know the Mayor and Councils
preference as to whether they want an annual report in the future. Ann agreed
to do the briefing on 211 as she had done for the Commission. The last item
on the agenda, Plans for Future Activity listed human service needs
which individual Commission members have expressed an interest in pursuing in
the past. Bill added that perhaps flexibility in the Rockville Emergency Assistance
Program should be added to the list. Mary Lou said that the issue of increasing
the maximum REAP payment should not go to the Mayor and Council until City staff
have been able to discuss the pros and cons in greater detail with the Commission.
Mary Lou added that the County does not always provide their full amount to
Rockville residents. Since City residents pay County taxes, they are entitled
to full benefits. Also, at the present time, Robin Sparer, the Youth, Family,
and Community Supervisor in charge of REAP, is approving applications above
the limit on a case by case basis.
David said that he would
like to see the issue of Community Linc of Montgomery County added to the list
of issues to be discussed. Community Linc was a database that provided a central
clearinghouse for Information and Referral services. Community Linc was terminated
because the County was going to provide this service. They have not yet fulfilled
that promise. Ann said that when Community Linc was discontinued, the County
said they would provide an Information and Referral service for the Aging and
Disability Community. That has been done. In addition, an information and referral
database has been put on the County website. David said he still thinks it would
be appropriate for the Mayor and Council to bring up the issue at an appropriate
time. Agnes said that, in view of the budgetary cuts being made in County services,
this does not seem like an appropriate time. Tom agreed saying that this is
a delicate time to discuss what the County should or should not do. Maybe a
later time would be better. Ann commented that, in addition, the County would
say they are supporting 211, which is the Community Linc of the future. Mary
Lou said that David could speak to a related aspect at the worksession, specifically
the needs of people with disabilities. At the last budget cycle, the City received
a request for funding for a group offering services to the disabled. That would
be an appropriate issue for the Mayor and Council and one area, perhaps, that
the City could have an impact. David said he would suggest that Lauren Newman
come speak to the Commission at a future meeting. He added that he feels strongly
about the issue of information and referral. The Commission's mandate is to
ensure that basic needs are being met. He feels that, at least, the topic should
be raised with the Mayor and Council.
Tom said that most of the
people he deals with at Manna Food Center are those in need. He thinks that
Bill's list of topics for panel discussion has a good mix of items. John agreed
to address the issue of affordable housing after consulting with Agnes and Darrell.
Deborah agreed to speak about transportation in place of Charlotte who will
be unable to attend. Charlotte is especially concerned about elderly people
who are not low income and who should not be driving. She thinks they need another
alternative. David said that Betsy Luecking, a supervisor for the County in
Aging and Disability Information and Referral, has information on this topic.
She could provide an overview and might be another possible guest for the Commission.
Ann asked if the Mayor
and Council could be asked about the Commission's responsibility to them and
how the Commission can be of assistance to them. Bill agreed to lay out the
three main areas in the Commission's charter which could be given to the Mayor
and Council before the meeting. Bill said he sees his role as trying to briefly
cover all the topics.
Re: Plan Agenda for
Next Meeting
Bill asked members if they
wanted to have a regular meeting in April in addition to the already scheduled
worksession with the Mayor and Council. David suggested that the next meeting
could be a "debriefing" for the worksession immediately following
the worksession. Members were in agreement with this plan. As a result there
will be no regular meeting in April.
Re: Adjourn
The next meeting of the
Human Services Advisory Commission will be held on April 7, 2003, at 111
Maryland Avenue in the Boards and Commissions Conference Room immediately
following the worksession with the Mayor and Council.
The next regular meeting
of the Human Services Advisory Commission will be held Tuesday, May 13, 2003,
from 7:30 - 9:30 PM, at 32 Courthouse Square.