City-wide Master Plan
Mayor and Council Public Hearing Summary
January 22, 2002
|
Issue |
Person |
Response |
Carver Educational Services Center Issues |
||
|
Carver Center site should not be designated for CPD, because there is no benefit to City |
Bob Bolcik, West End Citizens Assoc. Kate Savage Ted Reuther, College Gardens Civic Association Jim Reschovsky, Coalition for Responsible Use of School Land Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf Kate Ostell |
Because it affords the Mayor and Council more land use and design review and control than other processes, staff recommends retention of the CPD designation. This allows specific site-related issues to be addressed. |
|
Environmental setting of Carver Center will be threatened if site is developed intensely |
Martha Hale, Plymouth Woods Condo Assoc. |
Staff recommends text modification to address the setting to be preserved |
|
MCPS headquarters should be located in office space in Town Center, or on another site |
Martha Hale Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf Roy Lindgren |
Staff does not support |
|
Traffic impacts of more intensive use of site on residential streets |
Martha Hale Greg Philbrick |
Staff recommends no change as traffic impacts will be reviewed as part of a development proposal |
|
Concern about future MCPS building and compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods |
Bob Bolcik Martha Hale Kate Savage Ted Reuther Jim Reschovsky |
The CPD process can address these issues by imposing conditions; staff recommend no change |
|
The site should be preserved for educational use |
Martha Hale Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf |
Staff recommends clarifying text change about future uses |
|
Historic designation of site should be included in CWMP |
Ted Reuther Elizabeth Rodgers, HDC Martha Hale |
Plan supports (p. 8-12) |
|
Legacy of Carver High School and Carver Junior College should be preserved |
Ted Reuther Bob Harris Elizabeth Rodgers |
Plan supports (p. 8-12) |
|
Support for land use recommendations in CWMP |
Bob Harris, Holland & Knight, for MPCS |
Plan supports (p. 2-17) |
|
Preferred location for local government and educational facilities, including MCPS headquarters, Montgomery College Science Center, a museum dedicated to Carver High School history, government functions, Rock Terrace School and field use |
Bob Harris |
Staff recommends clarifying text change |
|
Delay historic designation until goals for future land use and preservation can be agreed upon |
Bob Harris |
Staff does not support |
|
Retain portion of façade that is original |
Bob Harris |
Current Plan supports (p. 2-17), clarifying text to be added |
|
Site should be developed with sensitivity to environmental setting and view of original school |
Bob Harris |
Staff recommends clarifying text change |
|
Develop process to review development plans with community |
Bob Harris |
Staff recommends clarifying text change |
|
Carver Center site should provide overflow parking for Montgomery College |
Roy Lindgren |
Staff does not support |
|
Buckingham Property Issues |
||
|
PRU development inappropriate on Buckingham property and would not result in benefits desired |
Bob Bolcik Kate Ostell West Citizen Petitioners |
PRU development, appropriately designed to address concerns, would achieve the Plan objectives. Staff recommends clarifying text be added to address objectives if desired. |
|
Support conventional zoning on Buckingham property, not PRU, possibly R-150 or R-S Zone |
Bob Bolcik |
Staff supports only if PRU option is not feasible. Plan objective of tree preservation less likely. |
|
Character of development in a PRU (small lot sizes, greater lot coverage, smaller setbacks) is inappropriate on Buckingham property due to neighborhood compatibility issues |
Bob Bolcik |
Development standards are approved by the Mayor and Council, and can be modified to address concerns. Staff recommends clarifying text be added if desired. |
|
Lack of availability of parking in PRU could result in overflow in neighborhood |
Bob Bolcik Matthew Shapiro |
Issue to be addressed by specific PRU |
|
No connection to Brent Road, delete phrase “unless there is no feasible way” |
Bob Bolcik West End Petitioners |
Plan currently supports no connection; No change recommended |
|
Property does not technically meet 5-acre minimum |
Bob Bolcik West End Petitioners |
Applicants are not precluded from assembling properties; no text change recommended |
|
Support PRU special development procedure on Buckingham property to preserve environmental features |
Bill Kominers, Holland & Knight, for Elm Street Development & Wycliffe LC |
Plan supports (p. 2-16) |
|
Support conventional R-60 zoning, and not the existing R-S zoning on the property if the PRU procedure is not recommended |
Bill Kominers |
Only if site not designated for PRU, staff recommends less dense single family zone other than R-60. Tree preservation not likely. |
|
Property should support smart growth objectives and neighborhood compatibility |
Bill Kominers |
Plan supports |
Woodmont Country Club/East Jefferson Street Issues |
||
|
Oppose extension of East Jefferson Street through Woodmont Country Club property |
Ronald Fisher Charlotte Joseph, Montrose Civic Assoc. |
Plan as recommended by Planning Commission, supports |
|
Residual land on Country Club property could be developed, exacerbating traffic problems |
Ronald Fisher Martha Norman, Woodmont Overlook Homeowners Assoc. |
Plan supports development of the entire property as CPD, which evaluates traffic impact |
|
Industrial development should be prohibited and commercial development limited to areas adjacent to Wootton Parkway and Rockville Pike |
Martha Norman Clifford Lanham |
Staff recommends clarifying text |
|
More than 20 percent of the site should be preserved as continuous open space |
Martha Norman Clifford Lanham |
Compliance with the Environmental Guidelines will likely result in preservation in excess of 20 percent |
|
Plan should not include text regarding development of Woodmont Country Club |
Martha Norman |
Staff recommends including recommendations on the future use of the property, even though it is not anticipated to develop, in order to have guidance in place should an unforeseen development be proposed |
|
Preserve the natural assets of Woodmont Country Club property if developed |
Martha Norman |
Staff supports text change |
|
Include significant buffer provision between future development on the Woodmont Country Club property and surrounding residential properties |
Martha Norman |
Staff supports text change |
|
Provision of pedestrian and bikeway connection through the Woodmont Country Club property as part of redevelopment should be consistently referenced in other relevant places throughout the document (p. 11-44, 4-17, 4-32) |
Barbara Sears/Erin Gerard, Linowes & Blocher, LLP for Woodmont Country Club Karen Voight, Village Green Condominium Earl Kendrick, Woodmont Spring Condominium Jerome Lewis, Woodmont Country Club |
Staff recommends clarifying text |
|
Traffic flow from development on Woodmont Country Club property should discourage commuter or through traffic on property and surrounding areas |
Martha Norman Clifford Lanham |
Staff recommends additional text to support discouraging through traffic in residential areas |
|
Woodmont Country Club should only be developed as a limited access neighborhood |
Martha Norman Clifford Lanham |
Staff does not support |
General Issues |
||
|
CWMP should use Census 2000 data |
James Noonan |
Staff recommends substitution of Census 2000 data for data in draft |
|
Reference 1997 Smart Growth Areas Act (p. 1-3) |
Edward Strocko, Maryland DOT |
Staff recommends text change |
|
Recommend a clear Implementation section |
Edward Strocko |
Staff recommends text change |
|
Land Use Issues |
||
|
Vision statement in Master Plan should represent thrust of all future planning in City |
Thomas Curtis |
Plan supports (p. 1-1) |
|
Support for annexation of Sub-area 8 of North Bethesda potential expansion area |
Charlotte Joseph |
Plan supports (p. 3-5) |
|
Transitions between O-1, O-2 and residential zones are insufficient |
Frank Anastazi |
Should be evaluated during an update of the West End neighborhood plan |
|
Transition areas between commercial and residential properties, such as South Washington Street, needs further consideration |
Carol Clifton |
Should be evaluated during an update of the West End neighborhood plan |
|
Development options listed (CPD, PRU with units other than SFD) that were considered for the Chestnut Lodge property are inappropriate and should be removed from text |
Kate Ostell Bob Bolcik |
The list includes options that were considered, and clearly states that the list does not include recommendations. No change recommended. |
|
Master Plan and Land Use Map should be as accurate as possible |
Dottie Thoms |
Staff supports |
|
Detention Center site and other properties should not be designated for CPD |
Bob Bolcik |
Zoning Ordinance currently permits CPD in the O-3 Zone and where recommended in the Master Plan |
Historic Preservation Issues |
||
|
Historic district evaluation should occur before development proposal |
Suzanne Fisher |
Requires policy direction |
|
Area plans should include identification and description of historic resources in each planning area |
Suzanne Fisher |
Staff supports; to be included in future neighborhood plans |
|
Treat City-owned properties same as private properties, including evaluation of City properties in timely fashion |
Suzanne Fisher |
Requires policy direction |
|
“Alternative Preservation Tools” should be titled “Additional Preservation Tools”, with appropriate descriptions |
Suzanne Fisher |
Staff supports |
|
Historic resources on Critical Parcels should be evaluated as part of initial planning and not in response to development |
Suzanne Fisher |
Requires policy direction |
|
Historic district and Town Center areas should have appropriate streetlight fixtures |
Andrea Hartranft, HDC |
Staff recommends this be included as part of streetscape standards to be developed |
|
Opposed to potential historic designation of South Washington Street properties (p. 8-11) due to limitations on property owners |
William/Eleanor Glattly Rev. John McDuffie, Christ Episcopal Church Carol Clifton Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner |
Policy direction required. Note: recommendation does not mean properties meet criteria. Alternatively, this area could be considered as part of Historic Resources Plan update. |
|
Potential closing of Vinson Street with parking garage and other future development in area inconsistent with potential historic designation |
Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner Carol Clifton William/Eleanor Glattly Rev. John McDuffie, Christ Episcopal Church |
See above |
|
Section should be added to West End section to state that it may be appropriate to rezone the properties to some commercial designation to reflect the changing character of the street |
Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner Carol Clifton William/Eleanor Glattly |
Staff does not support any consideration of rezoning until the West End Neighborhood Plan is updated and reviewed, and then would likely be rezoned to O-2 only if placed in the Transitional Zone. |
|
Chestnut Lodge property should be recommended to be designated historic, and include the Lodge itself, the entire frontage, the Little Lodge, the FFR cottage and Upper cottage |
Kate Ostell Bob Bolcik |
CWMP recommends designation of sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places but not in a City Historic District. Staff recommends clarifying text. |
Zoning Issues |
||
|
Text changes to paragraph about zoning of the Malasky property, removing the provision that it not be highway oriented and that full access to the adjacent road system be provided |
Kevin Fay |
Staff does not support removal of highway-oriented provision, but recommends clarifying text regarding access to the property |
|
Support for rezoning residual I-2 zoned land at Redland Technology Park |
Timothy Dugan, Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, for Redland Tech Center LLC Terry Peay, The Stephen A. Goldberg Company |
Plan supports, no change necessary (p. 2-25) |
|
Support for text amendment in advance of rezoning residual land at Redland Technology Park to I-3 |
Timothy Dugan |
Staff supports |
|
Support for language added by Planning Commission regarding the need to review uses in the C-1 Zone |
David Freishtat |
Plan supports (p. 2-24) |
|
Recommend reviewing the development standards of the I-3 Zone to allow more flexibility in design and parking, potentially as an optional method |
David Freishtat |
Policy direction required; could occur as part of Zoning Ordinance Update |
|
100 South Adams Street should remain residentially zoned, and perhaps a park created in its place by the City |
Bob Bolcik Sean Davis |
Staff recommend be evaluated as part of neighborhood planreview |
Environmental Issues |
||
|
Stormwater Management Pond in Glenora Park should not be constructed due to environmental impacts |
Edward Crockett |
Staff does not support; conflict with Watts Branch Watershed Management Plan |
|
New state SWM regulations should be addressed in text |
James Noonan, Maryland Dept of Planning |
Staff supports text change with a general statement about the new regulations |
|
Elaborate on implementation of recommendations for Habitats of Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species |
James Noonan |
Staff supports text addition |
|
Concern about mitigation of roadway noise impacts on Wootton Parkway |
James Kelly |
Staff recommends language that noise should be addressed as part of future improvements |
|
Plan should include specifics for noise reduction from I-270 |
Dottie Thoms |
Staff does not recommend adding specific measures; CWMP could suggest further study |
|
Future projects should be designed to avoid or minimize noise impacts (p. 427) |
Edward Strocko |
Staff recommends general statement as text addition |
|
Increased paving area does not substitute for SWM |
Martha Hale |
Staff recommends no text change |
|
Plan should encourage efficient use of raw materials and natural resources |
Matt Fleming, Maryland DNR |
Staff supports text change re: Green Building and sustainability strategies |
Transportation Issues |
||
|
Wootton Parkway should not be widened, due to safety concerns |
Eric Nelson/Sarah Anders Mr./Mrs. Douglas Wink John/Jane Conway Edward Crockett Jan Doak James/Lisa Onken Liana Harvath Jon Oberg Dottie Thoms |
Staff recommends preservation of right-of-way for future improvements, to be determined through study and a collaborative process with neighborhoods |
|
Wootton Parkway should be widened to make traffic flow safer |
Ted/Karen Earley |
See above |
|
Suggestion to allow employees to be paid for time spent working while taking public transportation |
Jon Oberg |
Concept could be explored in other venues |
|
Support long term development of alternatives for improvements to Wootton Parkway |
James Kelly |
Staff supports |
|
Delete par. 11-42 regarding use of Martha Lane as future road connection |
Charlotte Joseph |
Staff supports text change |
|
Traffic impact of new development on streets in Town Center |
Greg Philbrick, Woodley Gardens/West End HOA |
City to monitor and address |
|
New Mark Esplanade should be connected through to Monroe Street |
Marcella Bowell John Mistretta |
May be evaluated in neighborhood plan review |
|
CWMP should not modify the approved 1998 Bikeway Master Plan |
Irwin Cohen |
Staff recommends clarifying text to delineate relationship between Plans |
|
Bikeway Master Plan map in CWMP does not conform with Bikeway Master Plan map |
Irwin Cohen |
Staff recommends change to map |
|
Substitute text for “Bikeways” section (p. 4-11, 12) |
Irwin Cohen |
Staff does not recommend |
|
Install permanent plug for South Adams Street at intersection with East Jefferson Street |
Henry Boyce |
Should be addressed outside of the City-wide Master Plan process |
|
CWMP does not mention parking strategy |
Edward Strocko |
Issue for the Town Center Master Plan, and can be added to other neighborhood plans as they are reviewed and/or developed |
Neighborhood Planning Issues |
||
|
Concern about cut-through traffic and access problems in Fallsmead neighborhood |
James Kelly |
Staff recommends general text additions |
|
Town Center should recreate an inviting friendly atmosphere similar to downtown Rockville before urban renewal |
Thomas Curtis |
Addressed by Town Center Master Plan |
|
Montrose neighborhood cannot support recommendation that all students attend schools in Rockville clusters (p. 7-8) |
Charlotte Joseph |
No change necessary |
|
Text changes to add subdivisions to text, a more accurate neighborhood description, and mention of adjacent neighborhoods outside City limits (P.A. 14) |
Dottie Thoms |
Staff supports text change |
|
Returning streets to neighborhood streets |
Dottie Thoms |
Plan supports, no change required |
|
Discussion of Lakewood Country Club future land use should be included in P.A. 14 section |
Dottie Thoms |
Staff supports text change consistent with Critical Parcels discussion |
|
Plan should include reference to present and future land use of Karma Academy, as well as future expansions of other institutional uses in P.A. 14 |
Dottie Thoms |
Staff supports text change |
|
Recommend that neighborhood plan be prepared for P.A. 14 |
Dottie Thoms |
Consistent with Planning Commission recommendation to establish schedules and priorities for neighborhood plans |
|
Prepare neighborhood plan for Planning Area 5 |
Ted Reuther |
See above |
|
Factual text and map changes to p. 11-48 through 11-51 about Potomac Woods/Falls Orchard |
Carl Peterson |
Staff supports text change |
|
Coordinated Planning Area should be added to map on p. 11-17 |
Bob Bolcik |
Staff supports map change |
|
Parking concerns should be added to list of issues regarding institutional uses |
Bob Bolcik |
Staff recommends text change |