City-wide Master Plan

Mayor and Council Public Hearing Summary

January 22, 2002

 

 

Issue

Person

Response

Carver Educational Services Center Issues

Carver Center site should not be designated for CPD, because there is no benefit to City

Bob Bolcik, West End Citizens Assoc.

Kate Savage

Ted Reuther, College Gardens Civic Association

Jim Reschovsky, Coalition for Responsible Use of School Land

Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf

Kate Ostell

Because it affords the Mayor and Council more land use and design review and control than other processes, staff recommends retention of the CPD designation.  This allows specific site-related issues to be addressed. 

Environmental setting of Carver Center will be threatened if site is developed intensely

Martha Hale, Plymouth Woods Condo Assoc.

Staff recommends text modification to address the setting to be preserved

MCPS headquarters should be located in office space in Town Center, or on another site

Martha Hale

Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf

Roy Lindgren

Staff does not support

Traffic impacts of more intensive use of site on residential streets

Martha Hale

Greg Philbrick

Staff recommends no change as traffic impacts will be reviewed as part of a development proposal

Concern about future MCPS building and compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods

Bob Bolcik

Martha Hale

Kate Savage

Ted Reuther

Jim Reschovsky

The CPD process can address these issues by imposing conditions; staff recommend no change

The site should be preserved for educational use

Martha Hale

Isadora Paymer/Marc Strumpf

Staff recommends clarifying text change about future uses

Historic designation of site should be included in CWMP

Ted Reuther

Elizabeth Rodgers, HDC

Martha Hale

 

Plan supports (p. 8-12)

Legacy of Carver High School and Carver Junior College should be preserved

Ted Reuther

Bob Harris

Elizabeth Rodgers

Plan supports (p. 8-12)

Support for land use recommendations in CWMP

Bob Harris, Holland & Knight, for MPCS

 

Plan supports (p. 2-17)

Preferred location for local government and educational facilities, including MCPS headquarters, Montgomery College Science Center, a museum dedicated to Carver High School history, government functions, Rock Terrace School and field use

Bob Harris

Staff recommends clarifying text change

Delay historic designation until goals for future land use and preservation can be agreed upon

Bob Harris

 

Staff does not support

Retain portion of façade that is original

Bob Harris

Current Plan supports (p. 2-17), clarifying text to be added

Site should be developed with sensitivity to environmental setting and view of original school

Bob Harris

Staff recommends clarifying text change

Develop process to review development plans with community

Bob Harris

Staff recommends clarifying text change

Carver Center site should provide overflow parking for Montgomery College

Roy Lindgren

Staff does not support

Buckingham Property Issues

PRU development inappropriate on Buckingham property and would not result in benefits desired

Bob Bolcik

Kate Ostell

West Citizen Petitioners

PRU development, appropriately designed to address concerns, would achieve the Plan objectives.  Staff recommends clarifying text be added to address objectives if desired.

Support conventional zoning on Buckingham property, not PRU, possibly R-150 or R-S Zone

Bob Bolcik

Staff supports only if PRU option is not feasible.  Plan objective of tree preservation less likely.

 

 

Character of development in a PRU (small lot sizes, greater lot coverage, smaller setbacks) is inappropriate on Buckingham property due to neighborhood compatibility issues

Bob Bolcik

Development standards are approved by the Mayor and Council, and can be modified to address concerns.  Staff recommends clarifying text be added if desired.

Lack of availability of parking in PRU could result in overflow in neighborhood

Bob Bolcik

Matthew Shapiro

Issue to be addressed by specific PRU

No connection to Brent Road, delete phrase “unless there is no feasible way”

Bob Bolcik

West End Petitioners

Plan currently supports no connection; No change recommended

Property does not technically meet 5-acre minimum

Bob Bolcik

West End Petitioners

Applicants are not precluded from assembling properties; no text change recommended

Support PRU special development procedure on Buckingham property to preserve environmental features

Bill Kominers, Holland & Knight, for Elm Street Development & Wycliffe LC

Plan supports (p. 2-16)

Support conventional R-60 zoning, and not the existing R-S zoning on the property if the PRU procedure is not recommended

Bill Kominers

Only if site not designated for PRU, staff recommends less dense single family zone other than R-60.  Tree preservation not likely.

Property should support smart growth objectives and neighborhood compatibility

Bill Kominers

Plan supports

Woodmont Country Club/East Jefferson Street Issues

Oppose extension of East Jefferson Street through Woodmont Country Club property

Ronald Fisher

Charlotte Joseph, Montrose Civic Assoc.

Plan as recommended by Planning Commission, supports

Residual land on Country Club property could be developed, exacerbating traffic problems 

Ronald Fisher

Martha Norman, Woodmont Overlook Homeowners Assoc.

Plan supports development of the entire property as CPD, which evaluates traffic impact

Industrial development should be prohibited and commercial development limited to areas adjacent to Wootton Parkway and Rockville Pike

 

Martha Norman

Clifford Lanham

Staff recommends clarifying text

More than 20 percent of the site should be preserved as continuous open space

Martha Norman

Clifford Lanham

Compliance with the Environmental Guidelines will likely result in preservation in excess of 20 percent

Plan should not include text regarding development of Woodmont Country Club

Martha Norman

Staff recommends including recommendations on the future use of the property, even though it is not anticipated to develop, in order to have guidance in place should an unforeseen development be proposed

Preserve the natural assets of Woodmont Country Club property if developed

Martha Norman

Staff supports text change

Include significant buffer provision between future development on the Woodmont Country Club property and surrounding residential properties

Martha Norman

Staff supports text change

Provision of pedestrian and bikeway connection through the Woodmont Country Club property as part of redevelopment should be consistently referenced in other relevant places throughout the document (p. 11-44, 4-17, 4-32)

Barbara Sears/Erin Gerard, Linowes & Blocher, LLP for Woodmont Country Club

Karen Voight, Village Green Condominium

Earl Kendrick, Woodmont Spring Condominium

Jerome Lewis, Woodmont Country Club

Staff recommends clarifying text

Traffic flow from development on Woodmont Country Club property should discourage commuter or through traffic on property and surrounding areas

Martha Norman

Clifford Lanham

Staff recommends additional text to support discouraging through traffic in residential areas

Woodmont Country Club should only be developed as a limited access neighborhood

Martha Norman

Clifford Lanham

Staff does not support

General Issues

CWMP should use Census 2000 data

James Noonan

Staff recommends substitution of Census 2000 data for data in draft

Reference 1997 Smart Growth Areas Act (p. 1-3)

Edward Strocko, Maryland DOT

Staff recommends text change

Recommend a clear Implementation section

Edward Strocko

Staff recommends text change

 

 

Land Use Issues

Vision statement in Master Plan should represent thrust of all future planning in City

Thomas Curtis

Plan supports (p. 1-1)

Support for annexation of Sub-area 8 of North Bethesda potential expansion area

Charlotte Joseph

Plan supports (p. 3-5)

Transitions between O-1, O-2 and residential zones are insufficient

Frank Anastazi

Should be evaluated during an update of the West End neighborhood plan

Transition areas between commercial and residential properties, such as South Washington Street, needs further consideration

Carol Clifton

Should be evaluated during an update of the West End neighborhood plan

Development options listed (CPD, PRU with units other than SFD) that were considered for the Chestnut Lodge property are inappropriate and should be removed from text

Kate Ostell

Bob Bolcik

The list includes options that were considered, and clearly states that the list does not include recommendations. No change recommended.

Master Plan and Land Use Map should be as accurate as possible

Dottie Thoms

Staff supports

Detention Center site and other properties should not be designated for CPD

Bob Bolcik

Zoning Ordinance currently permits CPD in the O-3 Zone and where recommended in the Master Plan

Historic Preservation Issues

Historic district evaluation should occur before development proposal

Suzanne Fisher

Requires policy direction

Area plans should include identification and description of historic resources in each planning area

Suzanne Fisher

Staff supports; to be included in future neighborhood plans

Treat City-owned properties same as private properties, including evaluation of City properties in timely fashion

Suzanne Fisher

Requires policy direction

“Alternative Preservation Tools” should be titled “Additional Preservation Tools”, with appropriate descriptions

Suzanne Fisher

Staff supports

Historic resources on Critical Parcels should be evaluated as part of initial planning and not in response to development

Suzanne Fisher

Requires policy direction

Historic district and Town Center areas should have appropriate streetlight fixtures

Andrea Hartranft, HDC

Staff recommends this be included as part of streetscape standards to be developed

Opposed to potential historic designation of South Washington Street properties (p. 8-11) due to limitations on property owners

William/Eleanor Glattly

Rev. John McDuffie, Christ Episcopal Church

Carol Clifton

Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner

Policy direction required.  Note: recommendation does not mean properties meet criteria.  Alternatively, this area could be considered as part of Historic Resources Plan update.

Potential closing of Vinson Street with parking garage and other future development in area inconsistent with potential historic designation

Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner

Carol Clifton

William/Eleanor Glattly

Rev. John McDuffie, Christ Episcopal Church

See above

Section should be added to West End section to state that it may be appropriate to rezone the properties to some commercial designation to reflect the changing character of the street

Frederick Schneider/Sally Stinner

Carol Clifton

William/Eleanor Glattly

Staff does not support any consideration of rezoning until the West End Neighborhood Plan is updated and reviewed, and then would likely be rezoned to O-2 only if placed in the Transitional Zone.   

Chestnut Lodge property should be recommended to be designated historic, and include the Lodge itself, the entire frontage, the Little Lodge, the FFR cottage and Upper cottage

Kate Ostell

Bob Bolcik

CWMP recommends designation of sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places but not in a City Historic District.  Staff recommends clarifying text.

Zoning Issues

Text changes to paragraph about zoning of the Malasky property, removing the provision that it not be highway oriented and that full access to the adjacent road system be provided

Kevin Fay

Staff does not support removal of highway-oriented provision, but recommends clarifying text regarding access to the property

Support for rezoning residual I-2 zoned land at Redland Technology Park

Timothy Dugan, Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, for Redland Tech Center LLC

Terry Peay, The Stephen A. Goldberg Company

Plan supports, no change necessary (p. 2-25)

Support for text amendment in advance of rezoning residual land at Redland Technology Park to I-3

Timothy Dugan

Staff supports

Support for language added by Planning Commission regarding the need to review uses in the C-1 Zone

David Freishtat

Plan supports (p. 2-24)

Recommend reviewing the development standards of the I-3 Zone to allow more flexibility in design and parking, potentially as an optional method

David Freishtat

Policy direction required; could occur as part of Zoning Ordinance Update

100 South Adams Street should remain residentially zoned, and perhaps a park created in its place by the City

Bob Bolcik

Sean Davis

Staff recommend be evaluated as part of neighborhood planreview

Environmental Issues

Stormwater Management Pond in Glenora Park should not be constructed due to environmental impacts

Edward Crockett

Staff does not support; conflict with Watts Branch Watershed Management Plan

New state SWM regulations should be addressed in text

James Noonan, Maryland Dept of Planning

Staff supports text change with a general statement about the new regulations

Elaborate on implementation of recommendations for Habitats of Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species

James Noonan

Staff supports text addition

Concern about mitigation of roadway noise impacts on Wootton Parkway

James Kelly

Staff recommends language that noise should be addressed as part of future improvements

Plan should include specifics for noise reduction from I-270

Dottie Thoms

Staff does not recommend adding specific measures; CWMP could suggest further study

Future projects should be designed to avoid or minimize noise impacts (p. 427)

Edward Strocko

Staff recommends general statement as text addition

Increased paving area does not substitute for SWM

Martha Hale

Staff recommends no text change

Plan should encourage efficient use of raw materials and natural resources

Matt Fleming, Maryland DNR

Staff supports text change re: Green Building and sustainability strategies

Transportation Issues

Wootton Parkway should not be widened, due to safety concerns

Eric Nelson/Sarah Anders

Mr./Mrs. Douglas Wink

John/Jane Conway

Edward Crockett

Jan Doak

James/Lisa Onken

Liana Harvath

Jon Oberg

Dottie Thoms

Staff recommends preservation of right-of-way for future improvements, to be determined through study and a collaborative process with neighborhoods

Wootton Parkway should be widened to make traffic flow safer

Ted/Karen Earley

See above

Suggestion to allow employees to be paid for time spent working while taking public transportation

Jon Oberg

Concept could be explored in other venues

Support long term development of alternatives for improvements to Wootton Parkway

James Kelly

Staff supports

Delete par. 11-42 regarding use of Martha Lane as future road connection

Charlotte Joseph

Staff supports text change

Traffic impact of new development on streets in Town Center

Greg Philbrick, Woodley Gardens/West End        HOA

City to monitor and address

New Mark Esplanade should be connected through to Monroe Street

Marcella Bowell

John Mistretta

May be evaluated in neighborhood plan review

CWMP should not modify the approved 1998 Bikeway Master Plan

Irwin Cohen

Staff recommends clarifying text to delineate relationship between Plans

Bikeway Master Plan map in CWMP does not conform with Bikeway Master Plan map

Irwin Cohen

Staff recommends change to map

Substitute text for “Bikeways” section (p. 4-11, 12)

Irwin Cohen

Staff does not recommend

Install permanent plug for South Adams Street at intersection with East Jefferson Street

Henry Boyce

Should be addressed outside of the City-wide Master Plan process

CWMP does not mention parking strategy

Edward Strocko

Issue for the Town Center Master Plan, and can be added to other neighborhood plans as they are reviewed and/or developed

Neighborhood Planning Issues

Concern about cut-through traffic and access problems in Fallsmead neighborhood

James Kelly

Staff recommends general text additions

Town Center should recreate an inviting friendly atmosphere similar to downtown Rockville before urban renewal

Thomas Curtis

Addressed by Town Center Master Plan

Montrose neighborhood cannot support recommendation that all students attend schools in Rockville clusters (p. 7-8)

Charlotte Joseph

No change necessary

Text changes to add subdivisions to text,  a more accurate neighborhood description, and mention of adjacent neighborhoods outside City limits (P.A. 14)

Dottie Thoms

Staff supports text change

Returning streets to neighborhood streets

Dottie Thoms

Plan supports, no change required

Discussion of Lakewood Country Club future land use should be included in P.A. 14 section

Dottie Thoms

Staff supports text change consistent with Critical Parcels discussion

Plan should include reference to present and future land use of Karma Academy, as well as future expansions of other institutional uses in P.A. 14

Dottie Thoms

Staff supports text change

Recommend that neighborhood plan be prepared for P.A. 14

Dottie Thoms

Consistent with Planning Commission recommendation to establish schedules and priorities for neighborhood plans

Prepare neighborhood plan for Planning Area 5

Ted Reuther

See above

Factual text and map changes to p. 11-48 through 11-51 about Potomac Woods/Falls Orchard

Carl Peterson

Staff supports text change

Coordinated Planning Area should be added to map on p. 11-17

Bob Bolcik

Staff supports map change

Parking concerns should be added to list of issues regarding institutional uses

Bob Bolcik

Staff recommends text change